The M7’s image quality and 4K resolution means it can take on lots of different workloads, and the bright, punchy panel is paired with loads of connectivity options and plenty of smart features. The M7 doesn’t have the quality or gamut ability to handle colour-sensitive workloads, but it does have lashings of vibrancy, reasonable accuracy and stonking contrast, which makes it ideal for tackling everyday, mainstream workloads where colour isn’t key – and it’s great for media after work, too. Conversely, though, the Philips does have poorer contrast. The Philips’ smaller diagonal size means it’s a little crisper than the Samsung (Philips offers a 157ppi density level Samsung only manages 138ppi) and it uses IPS technology, which means better colours than the M7. This makes no difference in work applications, when browsing the web, and watching media, but it’s not ideal if you want to play games on this display too, and you’ll want a higher refresh rate if you want smooth animation in certain work tasks too. ![]() The peak brightness and the DCI-P3 gamut coverage level of 73.9% means it’s not good enough to handle HDR media or workloads either.Īlso bear in mind that the M7 has an 8ms response time, a 60Hz refresh rate and no adaptive sync. It only displays 71% of the Adobe RGB gamut and the VA panel uses 8-bit rather than 10-bit colour, so it’s not got the ability to handle colour-sensitive design and photography tasks. Go beyond this, though, and the M7 begins to falter. 8k is pointless these days anyway.Here is the Samsung M7 configuration sent to TechRadar Pro for review: I'd personally get a 34" or 38" ultrawide 1440p and call it a day. I think both 43" and 55" are dogshit for productivity. Another thing I saw is that some Samsung 8k models don't support Chroma 4:4:4, I just don't know if this is only true for the first models from ~3 years ago or if it still applies.Īnyway, does anyone have this model and can provide more information?įor those who use a 55" TV as a monitor (regardless of resolution), do you find it ergonomic? Can you use it without having to turn your head too much to look at the edges? However, I wonder if using a 55" TV is ergonomic. I couldn't find any reviews on it (only for the 800 and 900 models, I don't know the differences), but the increase in area with 4x more resolution would be extremely useful for my daily usage. However, I feel that I wouldn't feel a significant upgrade by making this change until I realized that we already have 8k TVs on the market, where the smallest one I found was this single 55" model available here in Brazil, the QN700B. I rarely play games and most of the time I use it for work/study and shitpost on this forum. ![]() ![]() Its 120hz refresh rate seems interesting, but it's not something I really care about. Initially, I was thinking of just getting an LG C2 42", which would improve the screen quality itself, and they say that burn-in problems practically don't exist anymore. Currently, I have an entry-level LG 4k 43" (43UK6520PSA) that I use as a monitor at about 60cm away and it has been serving me well, but some things about it are already showing signs of age and I am considering replacing it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |